Nissan Brake Defect Class Action Faces Setback in Court

A significant class action lawsuit against Nissan North America has encountered a legal hurdle after a U.S. court decertified the case, preventing affected vehicle owners from pursuing claims as a unified group. The lawsuit initially alleged that certain Nissan vehicles contained defective braking systems, which could lead to unexpected loss of braking power and increase the risk of accidents.

Background of the Lawsuit

The class action lawsuit accused Nissan of equipping certain vehicles with flawed braking components, including the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system and brake master cylinders, which allegedly caused inconsistent or unexpected braking behavior.

Many Nissan drivers reported that their vehicles would either fail to stop properly or experience sudden braking without warning, posing serious safety concerns. The lawsuit claimed Nissan was aware of these defects but failed to take sufficient action to address them or properly notify consumers.

Which Vehicles Were Affected?

The lawsuit originally sought to cover a range of Nissan models with the alleged brake defects, including:

  • 2019-2021 Nissan Altima
  • 2017-2020 Nissan Rogue
  • 2017-2021 Nissan Rogue Sport
  • 2020-2021 Nissan Kicks

Although Nissan has denied any wrongdoing, the automaker has issued multiple technical service bulletins (TSBs) to address customer complaints about braking inconsistencies and failures.

What This Means for Nissan Owners

With the class action decertified, affected Nissan owners may no longer be able to seek compensation as a group. However, this does not prevent individuals from pursuing legal action independently. In many cases, filing an individual claim can lead to better compensation than participating in a class action settlement, which may only offer limited repairs or reimbursements.

How Nissan Owners Can Take Back Control

While this class action lawsuit has been initiated, thousands of Nissan owners are likely affected by the same alleged brake defects, with many dissatisfied by Nissan’s lack of resolution. These types of issues often lead to escalated legal action, highlighting the importance of protecting consumer rights.

If you struggle with vehicle troubles and feel cornered against big vehicle brands, remember it is always better to have experts with you. With extensive experience and successful cases at hand, The Lemon Firm is your best bet. With dedicated team members always at your disposal, the package becomes too good to be true. So, if your car is giving you a headache, don’t hesitate to reach out!

Call 833 Lemon Firm and speak with a case analyst today!

About the Author
Sepehr Daghighian is a partner with CCA that is well-versed in all aspects of lemon-law litigation. A 2005 graduate of Loyola Law School, Mr. Daghighian has been practicing litigation throughout the state of California for over 13-years. In this time, Mr. Daghighian has advocated on behalf of California consumers in hundreds of lemon law cases throughout our great state. Mr. Daghighian has also successfully tried numerous such cases to verdict in both Federal and State Court.