Author: admin

Ferrari is now the target of a class action complaint that claims the automaker marketed vehicles with faulty brakes. According to the case filed in federal court in San Francisco, the brakes on some Ferrari models are prone to sudden failure, which can result in unfortunate incidents.

The complaint demands a recall of all impacted automobiles and monetary damages for those who bought damaged autos. Here’s a detailed overview of the class action lawsuit over the Ferrari Defective Braking System.

In-Depth Analysis

The suit asserts that certain Ferrari models’ brakes are likely to fail, resulting in collisions and accidents. The case was filed by two men who say they were involved in accidents due to faulty brakes. They are seeking unspecified damages from Ferrari.

The defects in the braking system are said to affect several Ferrari models, including the California, 458 Italia, and F12 Berlinetta. The lawsuits allege that the brake calipers on these vehicles can seize up, causing the brakes to fail. This can lead to severe accidents for passengers and pedestrians.

Ferrari has not commented on the lawsuit, but the company has been hit with similar lawsuits. A class action lawsuit over Ferrari’s faulty steering systems was filed in 2013. Another suit was brought in 2015 on allegations that Ferrari’s sports vehicles were prone to engine fires.

These cases are filed at a time when authorities are scrutinizing Ferrari more closely. The NHTSA opened an inquiry into claims of Ferrari car engine fires last year. Additionally, the American Securities and Exchange Commission recently disclosed that it was investigating Ferrari’s potential accounting problems.

Potential Damages

The problem affects Ferraris with manual transmissions and is caused by a wear-and-tear issue that can leak brake fluid onto the engine. Ferrari has issued a recall for affected models, but the problem has already caused several fires, leading some to question the safety of these vehicles.

Ferrari has previously been mentioned in the headlines for alleged safety concerns. In 2015, the company recalled its 458 Italia models after reports surfaced that the car’s steering wheel could detach while driving. And in 2016, Ferrari issued a recall for its California T model after discovering that the car’s sunroof could detach and fly off while driving.

Given these past issues, some consumers are hesitant to purchase Ferrari vehicles, despite their luxury status. Whether the company can regain its reputation for high quality and safety will only be determined over time.

Ferrari’s Response

The lawsuit claimed that Ferrari failed to disclose a known issue with the braking system, which could cause the brakes to die suddenly and without warning. In response to the lawsuit, Ferrari issued a statement denying any responsibility for the alleged defects. The company claimed that it had fully disclosed all information about the braking system to customers and that it met all safety standards.

Moreover, Ferrari pointed out that the brake system had been successfully tested in other vehicles without incident. Given the denial from Ferrari, it seems that the lawsuit will continue to progress. It will be interesting to see how this case unfolds and whether or not Ferrari will be held liable for the alleged defects.

Main Concerns of Plaintiffs

The lawsuit, filed by plaintiffs in California and New Jersey, alleges that the brake pads on Ferrari vehicles can wear down prematurely, causing the brakes to fail. 

The plaintiffs claimed that this defect had led to accidents and injuries, including one plaintiff who was involved in a car crash when her brakes failed. Ferrari denies the problem with its brakes and has vowed to fight the lawsuit. However, if the lawsuit is successful, it could lead to a recall of Ferrari vehicles and millions of dollars in damages.

Consequences of the Lawsuit

The consequences of this lawsuit could be significant for Ferrari. The plaintiffs may get a sizable monetary award if the action is successful. Additionally, it could damage Ferrari’s reputation and lead to fewer people buying its cars. It is obvious that this is a severe issue with the potential to harm Ferrari, though.

How Can You Stay Informed About the Case?

If you own a Ferrari, you might want to monitor a class-action lawsuit against the manufacturer. The lawsuit alleges Ferrari’s braking system is defective, claiming that the company knew about the issue but failed to address it. If you’re affected by the defect, you may be entitled to compensation. 

To stay informed about the case, you can check for updates on the lawsuit website or speak to the Lemon Firm attorneys. You should also consider whether to join the class action or not. If you do, you’ll be represented by an attorney, and you won’t have to pay any legal fees. It’s crucial to keep informed so you can defend your rights.

Significant Benefits of the Lawsuit

The defective brake system will be repaired for free by Ferrari and its dealer network. As a result of the brake defect, however, you may not be compensated for any financial or physical loss. You may be eligible for more compensation by filing a Ferrari brake failure lawsuit if your Ferrari was injured or damaged by the faulty brake system or if you believe you paid too much for it, given the recall.

Our attorneys aim to help you recover damages if you have lost money or experienced sudden brake failure because of Ferrari’s defective brake fluid reservoir cap.

Bottom Line!

A class-action lawsuit has been filed against Ferrari over a braking system defect linked to a number of accidents. You could be eligible for compensation if you were harmed by this flaw. 

The skilled lawyers at the Lemon Company have had success in getting our clients compensated who purchased faulty cars, and we can do the same for you. If you wish to discuss your case with one of our attorneys, we are here for you. Case evaluations are always FREE. Call (833) Lemon-firm to speak with a Lemon Law expert today.

Why Is Your Hitch Wiring Harness Going Bad? 

Despite how safely you drive, how you wear seatbelts, and how well-maintained your car is, if you don’t care about what’s going on inside the boot or the hitch wiring harness, you’ll never be able to fully-guaranteed about security. Moreover, the wiring harness is just as crucial as fuel pumps, engines, suspension systems, etc. Because they can be burned and broken, causing great damage to the car due to the defects in your system. 

But have you ever thought about the reasons your hitch-wiring harness getting faults? You probably are not! That’s why here are a few reasons to let you signify about the malfunction in the hitch wiring of your vehicle.  

Uneven Braking 

The hitch wire, which connects your car’s electrical system to the trailer, might be faulty for various reasons, including difficulty braking. Due to the length of the wire interconnecting each magnet connection, imbalance braking results in inconsistent braking performance at each wheel as it increases the resistance level. This resistance is frequent in automobiles and eventually becomes the cause of faulty hitch wiring because it causes the trailer to twirl when you apply brakes.

Poor Designs

There are five wires for which the trailer of the car is designed. But imagine! What would happen if the designs were poorly built? Of course, they will affect the hitch wiring harness of your vehicle to a greater extent since connecting the hitch to the trailer will become impossible. That’s why poor designs are also among the reasons for faulty hitch wiring.  

Sub-standard Materials

Not all automakers are that honest to use pure copper to do the wiring of your vehicle’s hitch. Because the copper alloy is mainly used for this purpose, it’s definitely a cheap alternative to high-quality copper, but it’s likely to get overheated and break soon. Thus, some automakers use sub-par materials (copper alloy) while manufacturing automobiles, which eventually becomes the reason for the malfunctioning in hitch wiring. 

The First Recall of Hyundai & KIA over the Malfunctioning Tow Wiring

Hyundai and Kia launched their first recalls, affecting almost two million Hyundai Palisades and thirty thousand Kia Tellurides. The problem is that all these vehicles have defective hitch wiring, which might pose a severe risk to automobile owners. As a result, the automaker stated that dirt and dampness could accumulate on a circuit board in the tow hitch wire, resulting in an electrical short and a burn. As a result, car owners have been urged to keep their vehicles outdoors and away from homes and other constructions until the automotive company has fixed them.

However, the auto firm announcing the recall does not imply that it should be mocked or demeaned because of the manufacturing issue. The recalls may be beneficial or harmful. If a firm recalls on its own, it should be commended. The same can be said for Hyundai and Kia, both big automotive industry brands with numerous indisputable global recognitions. 

Our Right Over Defects – How Can You File A Lawsuit Against The Carmakers?

Cars are among the most precious commodities, and one buys them with the expectation that they will last longer. But what if you discovered a flaw a few years ago, and your automobile now spends more time in the shop than on the route? First, seek recalls issued by the automobile manufacturer. It simply means that owners of recalled vehicles have the right to take their vehicles to dealerships and have the problematic parts fixed or replaced for free. Well! Most firms do not do it. Although Hyundai, Kia, Toyota, and others appear to publish recalls frequently.

However, automobile manufacturers do not always recall, and occasionally the problem persists even after treatment. These vehicles are referred to as “lemons” because they feature a flaw that significantly hinders the owner’s ability to drive a vehicle. You are eligible for a refund or a replacement vehicle if you find that your automobile is a lemon. 

Seeking For a Lawyer Regarding Defects, Repairs, and Lawsuits?

Defective car parts can be annoying and can cause major problems. Even you are not safe when you are driving. Auto Justice Attorneys can assist you in resolving such problems. You may have problems finding a professional attorney to file a case, but you no longer need to be concerned. We don’t want to downplay these concerns because we are a lemon law firm that sues automakers. Let’s discuss today if you’ve had any of these problems or others with your hybrid or EV. Because our skilled attorneys at our Lemon Company have successfully recovered compensation for our clients who were sold a car with manufacturing issues, we can do the same for you.

To talk with a Lemon Law specialist today, call (833) Lemon-Firm.

Automotive giant General Motors is the one who owns the most famous car brands in the world, such as Cadillac, GMC, Buick, and Chevrolet. If you look at the specs of the popular vehicle types of each of these brands, they’ll seem to be quite sturdy, fast, luxurious cars. However, sometimes things aren’t like how they seem. You’ll definitely realize that all isn’t perfect if you hear actual reviews from those who have bought the 8-speed or newer 10-speed transmission cars.

Though General Motors is one of the most popular names you’ll ever come across, it certainly doesn’t mean you’ll only hear praise from those driving their vehicles. In fact, you’ll find it’s quite the opposite, with GM repeatedly being in the hot seat in the eyes of the law. After being caught up in a class action lawsuit regarding their vehicles with 8-speed transmissions, there seems to be further trouble awaiting them since the release of their 10-speed transmission cars.

Previous 8-Speed GM Transmission Lawsuit

When it comes to General Motors’ 8L90 and 8L45 8-speed auto transmissions, you will find a long class action lawsuit history pertaining to them. Those driving their cars have complained about hard shifts, jerks, and violent shakes. However, GM didn’t do anything to solve the problem. So, in May of 2022, in the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, a brand new class action lawsuit was filed related to the same issues found with the 8LXX transmissions. 

This lawsuit was pertinent to GMC, Cadillac, and Chevrolet 2019-2022 model vehicles purchased after the first of March. The plaintiffs said that the issues such as surging, lurching, hesitation and jerking are serious safety hazards, as they significantly affect the deceleration, acceleration, and speed of the vehicle. Moreover, they stated that GM has known about these problems since 2013 but has never solved them.

Furthermore, while the transmissions have coverage within GM’s express warranty, it seems that the problems brought forward by the plaintiffs are expressly excluded. The lawsuit stated that General Motors can’t solve the transmission issues, only planning to redesign the ones for the 2023 model year. Dealerships who receive vehicles from customers to repair these issues are simply told that the transmissions work just fine. Some dealerships might even replace them or related components with parts that are just as defective. Despite everything, GM still hasn’t recalled the affected vehicles. 

The vehicles with this specific transmission were the following models from 2019-2022:

  • GMC Sierra
  • GMC Canyon

These were the 2019 GM-manufactured vehicles with defective transmissions:

  • Cadillac CTS, CTS-V, CT6, ATS, ATS-V
  • Chevrolet Corvette
  • Chevrolet Silverado
  • Chevrolet Colorado
  • Chevrolet Camaro

History of the GM 10L80 Hydra-Matic

General Motors developed their GM 10L80 Hydra-Matic transmission in conjunction with Ford, which employs a variation of this in their Ford Mustang GT and can be found in the Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 as well. Though the engineering mechanics are the same, the Ford 10R80 and the GM 10L80 have separate control software and minor differences to adapt to each application. 

GM’s transmissions are created at their Romulus, Michigan transmission factory, spending only $323 million on retooling, whereas Ford allegedly spent $1.4 billion.

Fuss behind GM’s 10-Speed transmission

The aim of the GM 10L80 is to provide performance and efficiency. Its automatic mechanism keeps the engine in the best power band when the driver accelerates. Maximum fuel economy is employed when upshifted to any one of the three overdrive gears. Their gear spacing is meant to be unsurpassed; the engine’s RPM only drops about 20% as the transmission changes gear. The gear ratios are supposed to make the downshifts and upshifts lightning fast. When the engine is in the optimal RPM range, the 10l80 can operate almost as efficiently as the CVT transmission. 

Since you can choose ten forward gears, this transmission can reduce an engine with high horsepower fuel consumption. But their gearing isn’t the only reason behind the 10L80 maximizing efficiency. The lost energy is reduced as only 2 out of 6 clutches stay open simultaneously. It has an internal thermal bypass that allows transmissions to warm up quicker, which reduces fuel consumption. Fluid pressure is maintained through an off-axis pump which can change the displacement according to the load. A second pump helps maintain fluid pressure when the start/stop function is activated.

Though it has two extra gears than 8-speed transmissions, it isn’t heavier or bigger than the 6L90 or 8L90. It weighs 230 lbs. when dry and is considerably light. It doesn’t constitute any cast-iron components, even for the transmission stator support. The aluminum case has a thin 260mm torque converter within the fused bell housing. It has two brake clutches and four rotating gear sets, with only one extra clutch than the 8-speed transmission. 

Investigation Underway Regarding the GM Cars

For both the Allison 10-speed 10L1000 found in the GMC Sierra and Chevrolet Silverado models released from 2020 onwards and the GM 10L80 Hydra-Matic, an investigation is underway so a class-action lawsuit can be pursued against the manufacturers. 

Common Issues That GM Vehicle Owners Noted

There are significant issues that GM vehicle owners noted, similar to the ones that the Ford 10R80 and the Alissa 10-Speed 10L1000, primarily check engine light errors, oil leaks, banging sounds, lurches, loss of power, and transmission slippage. These are all severe problems that can cause many injuries to passengers, possibly proving fatal, and thus need to be taken extremely seriously. 

About the Current Class Action Lawsuit

Attorneys are gathering evidence and investigating the vehicles to make their case rock solid. If this class action lawsuit regarding the 10L80 Hydra-Matic transmission is pursued successfully, then GM will need to recall the vehicles that have these transmissions fitted. Moreover, because of their previous lawsuits, it doesn’t seem that this will be an easy situation for them to get out of. 

In A Nutshell

Though it’s great, automotive giants like General Motors are trying to innovate and provide their customers with robust, fuel-efficient transmissions. The risk they are putting people into cannot be justified. With recurrent lawsuits based on their faulty 8-speed and 10-speed transmissions, it’s safe to say they need to change how they’re working and recall the vehicles to prevent new owners from getting hurt.

If you are stuck on how to get compensation for your vehicle having a defective part, our expert attorneys can help you out. Professionals at The Lemon Firm have assisted several individuals in successfully reimbursing money due to manufacturing defects.

If you happen to find yourself frustrated with repeated trips to the dealership, missing time from work and having to rent or borrow cars you are not alone. Our experienced attorneys can handle all auto lemon cases so that you do not need to suffer anymore. Call (833) the Lemon Firm if you want to consult with a case analyst today.

Ford has been notorious for its scandals, which date back over half a century. At the start of the ‘80s, the Ford Motor Company had to pay approximately 20 million dollars to settle lawsuits. These resulted from the faulty transmissions in the vehicles they manufactured between 1966 and 1979. Over 23 million Ford vehicles had those transmissions. They would cause the car to go in reverse even after the driver put it in park mode. In 1980, the Center for Auto Safety in Washington released a report stating that 1,500 injuries and almost 100 deaths had occurred as a result of defective transmissions.

Unfortunately, history does repeat itself. Ford is undergoing several class action lawsuits due to their Ford F-150 10-speed automatic transmissions, first released in their 2017 trucks. They seemed to be reliable at first, but over the past few years, many issues have come to light, causing drivers to worry about whether their investment was worth the risk or not. We have compiled all the information regarding the latest ongoing Ford class action lawsuit, so if you’d like to learn all about it, keep reading!

About the F-150 10-Speed Transmissions

The 10-speed transmission in question has been optional since its birth, but with the 2021 F-150, it became the standard. Of course, it seemed beneficial to go for 10 different speeds as they provide:

  • A more enhanced than the Chevy, offering 6 and 8-speed automatic transmissions.
  • Optimize fuel economy.
  • Claimed to perform better than previous Ford truck transmissions.

Cause of the Transmission Issues

Some 2017 F-150 owners noted that their vehicle’s transmission would slip under acceleration or slam into gear. It was even observed that the transmission would slip out of the gear when accelerated. Other Ford vehicle owners noted that their transmission would intermittently lock into a random gear and be able to change it. They would have to keep it parked for a few hours before they could start driving it as normal. However, these issues are recurring and can be very stressful to undergo.

As per the ClassAction.org attorneys investigating the recent Ford transmission issues, it may be due to a design or manufacturing defect present within all the latest 10-speed auto transmissions.

The Ford Vehicles Currently Under Investigation

The attorneys involved in the class action lawsuit further investigated the claims of people facing issues with the 10R80 transmission installed in their Ford vehicle. These include:

  • The 2018-2022 Lincoln Nav
  • The 2019-2022 Ranger
  • The 2018-2022 Mustang
  • The 2018-2022 Expedition

Earlier in 2022, Ford published an official “technical service bulletin” that stated the specified cars have an issue with their transmission and might cause the light to indicate that you should check your engine to illuminate. This issued statement did outline a solution to the problem, but drivers have reported that it did not work, with those who didn’t have a warranty having to pay for labor themselves. 

The class action lawsuit against Ford, which has been proposed, is due to some Ford vehicle owners facing an issue with the F-150 10-speed transmission and alleging that it does create a considerable risk of death and bodily harm. It has led to the vehicle’s value decreasing. Attorneys suspect this isn’t an entire issue and that those driving other Ford vehicle models with the 10-speed transmission can also make the same claim.

Reports by Ford Vehicle Owners

When the 10-speed transmission was released in Ford vehicles in 2017 onwards, Ford issued a technical service bulletin a year later, advising dealers to reprogram the truck’s ECU if harsh shifting was being experienced. However, even when the vehicle owners went to the dealer to get the work done, it would continue to be problematic. Moreover, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration stated that most drivers would experience the issue worsening after returning.

In the next 2 or so years, Ford vehicle owners would experience a loud pounding noise when the gear was shifted, after which there would be a harsh jerk. Many also reported the transmission making a loud noise when they’d put the gear into drive mode from the Park. In addition, complainants noted that technicians couldn’t repeat the specific issues when they took their truck to a Ford dealer. Other times, they’d tell the drivers that the truck was completely fine. This goes to show the unpredictability of the transmission issues. One 2021 F-150 owner who only had 200 miles on their vehicle lodged a complaint with the NHTSA, stating that the technician working at the Ford dealership claimed that the transmission and shifter were experiencing a communication error. Moreover, the driver was told that Ford did not have any solution to this problem. 

Ford Attempting to Take Action

In the first quarter of 2021, it was reported that Ford recalled approximately 50,000 of the F-150 2021 trucks, as the transmission would spontaneously shift gears into neutral. The truck would then stop, automatically going into park mode. This report claimed that software issues were to blame for this. Ford explained that the vehicle’s software would falsely indicate low transmission pressure to the ECU, making the gear by default shift to Neutral and then to Park once the car stops. The mechanism automatically does this when it fears the transmission will get damaged. The reference number for this recall is 22V188.

After a year, Ford took the initiative by introducing some steps to help fix problems with the 10-speed transmissions. The first step that Ford took was to replace the chips that held the shifter cable. Some trucks needed some unidentified components to be replaced. In several cases, Ford extended the warranties for drivers while trying to identify the problems.

How Will the Class Action Lawsuit Help?

The proposed class action lawsuit can help affected drivers recover all the money spent on repairs and compensate them for their vehicle’s decreasing value. The lawsuit can also force Ford into recalling and adequately remedying the prevalent transmission issue free of cost.

Bottom Line

If a prominent car manufacturer such as Ford can seem to be selling cars with a faulty transmission and is having trouble figuring out the issue, then indeed, many others would also be doing something similar. Thus, observing the problems you are facing is crucial, especially if your car is relatively new.

If you happen to find yourself with frustrated with repeated trips to the dealership, missing time from work and having to rent or borrow cars you are not alone. Our experienced attorneys can handle all auto lemon cases so that you do not need to suffer anymore. Call (833) the Lemon Firm if you want to consult with a case analyst today.

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles are in the headlines once again. Despite producing highly-popular and comfortable vehicles, this company is always under discussion for faulty car equipment. The latest case includes the problematic water pumps of the Dodge Durango and Jeep Grand Cherokee. Let’s take a deeper look!

Drivers Highlighting Water Pump Problems

Customer comfort and quality products are the two main goals of large businesses. In a market, the credibility of any product declines when a massive audience experiences similar flaws. The consumers of FCA report some problems with the water pump. The specific models of Dodge and Jeep fail to gain customer satisfaction when the users experience burning smells from their car engines. Some people also indicate a decreased level of coolant after every few miles. This pump failure leads to overheating the car’s engine, ultimately forcing the owners to opt for a water pump replacement.

Models of Dodge and Jeep Having the Issue

Are you a fan of family-supportive minivans or off-roading favorites – Jeep? If you are the owner of one such car, you must be aware of the Jeep and Dodge water pump problems. According to the FCA’s service bulletin, models from 2013 to 2017 are having that problem. The Dodge Durango (WD) and the Jeep Grand Cherokee (WK and W2) models are confirmed to have water pump issues. Similarly, the company verifies the problem with the Jeep Grand Cherokee (W3) model from 2014 to 2017 in their Jeep technical service bulletin.

Cost of Water Pump Replacement from a Private Dealership

Continuous overheating of your car can lead to engine seizures. A smart person will definitely pay some extra bucks to replace the water pump instead of handing over the massive amount for engine repair on his automobile. The average cost of a Jeep or Dodge water pump replacement is $100. The owners considered the water pump failure to be a manufacturing flaw. Therefore, they demanded an extended warranty period and a free water pump replacement from FCA. 

The Company Responded To the Problem with a Service Bulletin

To reimburse their users, the FCA issued a technical bulletin for the dealership to inspect and replace the 5.7L and 6.4L water pumps where needed. It also involves the announcement of a warranty period extension.  

Indications That the Water Pump Needs Replacement

The marks that your car has a pump issue and needs substitutions were elaborated in the Jeep technical service bulletin. Water pump complications result from mechanical seal damage before time. The car engine cannot cool down on the pump damage, eventually leading to bearing failure. The bulletin mentioned two main symptoms of the Jeep and Dodge water pump problems:

  • Bearing Noise: Arises from the mechanical wear of the seal.
  • Coolant Leak: Results in overheating your car engine and causing engine damage or even seizure.

How to Professionally Recognize the Issue?

How will you detect water pump issues, and how will you find out the extent of the damage? The detailed procedure for determining the damaged water pump is a noticeable feature of the Jeep technical service bulletin. If the owner describes the signs mentioned in the above section, the automobile company asks the professionals to follow a simple diagnostic procedure.

To inspect the Jeep and Dodge water pump problem, open up the vehicle hood and examine the pump impairment as follows:

  • Coolant Leakage: The service bulletin called for the dealership specialist to carefully observe the weep chamber to find any evidence of leakage. It might be in the form of wetness on the chamber (under the shaft behind the pulley) or in the form of pink deposits.
  • Bearing Noise: Turn on the car engine and check for unusual bearing noise.
  • Play in The Pulley: Note the looseness or wiggling of the water pump pulley. Detect the play in different directions to confirm the pump’s defacement. 

The bulletin clearly mentioned that if the above-described problems are noticeable in under-discussion Dodge and Jeep variants, the dealer should go for a repair and replacement process. However, a further vehicle inspection is required if the mentioned symptoms are not recognized.  

Replace the Damaged Water Pump

According to the service bulletin, the defaulted pump must be replaced if the damage is irreparable. Before starting the procedure, ensure your engine is turned off and cooled down properly. First, drain all the engine coolant, followed by removing the belt drive and chain (follow the procedure provided in DealerCONNECT). Remove the hose and old water pump by unscrewing the bolts. Detach the mechanical seal or gasket and examine the cooling system components like:

  • Thermostat
  • Coolant hoses
  • Pressure cap(s)

Now, install the freshwater pump along with the gasket and apply a sealant (only if recommended). Rewind the procedure – fasten the bolts, attach the water hose, and fill the specific coolant in the cooling system again. Rotate the pump by hand and turn on the engine. Moreover, make sure there is no further leakage. Jeep and Dodge water pump problems can return in no time if that equipment is not installed accurately. Hence, replace the pump according to the procedure described earlier (per Jeep technical service bulletin).

Extended Warranty for Affected Customers

Large corporations are known for providing more incentives to the audience to retain their clients and preserve their reputation. FCA has expanded the warranty span to 7 years for water pump replacements on Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango models. Furthermore, the company eases its users by removing all the Miles limits for water pump repair in their service bulletin. We must admit that this is a significant step toward resolving customer issues. The Jeep technical service bulletin is pertinent to the automobiles in these markets and countries: NAFTA, EMEA, APAC, and LATAM. 

Bottom Line

Your automobile’s non-functional water pump can lead to massive crises. If you own any of these vehicles with water pump problems or a Tigershark engine, contact the Lemon Firm (833) because you may be eligible for reimbursement or financial compensation.

Contact Us for a Free Consultation

Have you ever been a buyer of Chrysler? Your family might love the over-commodious minivan with beautiful looks. However, this car company has undergone several lawsuits regarding different malfunction issues. Today, we are going to discuss the stalling issues of the Chrysler Pacifica. The problem has landed the company in another class-action case.

Chrysler Pacifica – An Equally Comfortable and Cargo-Space Minivan

A spacious and comfortable vehicle must be your top priority if you have a big family. Since its inception in 1925, the Chrysler brand has pleased customers with unique designs, artistry, insightful inventions, and technology. The Chrysler model Pacifica is adorned with its high-end family features and versatile exteriors. This 8-seater minivan won the parents’ trust regarding safety, interior volume, convenient features, etc. It has been proven that this family-admired vehicle has been picked up for “Parents’ Best Family Car 2022” for the 3rd time in a row. 

The rear fold-flat seats are an extra benefit for shuttling cargo along with people. Amazon Fire TV compatibility and back occupant alert are the latest and appreciable features of the 2022 Pacifica. This minivan provides entertainment and reliable protection on long drives and family trips. 

Minivan Issues That Lead to a Lawsuit

How did a great car like the Chrysler Pacifica hit a class-action case? Unfortunately, it’s true! The owners of Chrysler have faced some irrefutable problems. The Chrysler Pacifica lawsuit was filed as a result of the following issues with the minivan:

  • The major problem was stalling. Consumers reported that the Chrysler Pacifica car stalls or shuts off during the drive. These stalling defects are due to the design faults of the 9-speed transmission in car engines.
  • The minivan stops functioning upon a complete loss of power. The driver of the car lost control of the steering wheel and could not modify the vehicle’s speed.
  • The customers considered the stalling of minivans a challenging and potentially damageable issue.
  • Above all, all the drivers indicated that the problem arose without any prior indication.

Class Action in 2017 and 2018

On behalf of the issues mentioned above, a lawsuit was filed against FCA (a company producing many cars, including the Chrysler Pacifica) in December 2017. The plaintiff accused the Chrysler Pacifica car of stalling and its engine shutting down. He claimed that the synchronization between the crankshaft position and engine timing had been lost, causing the car engine to hold up and stall. Moreover, the minivan reflected signal transmission issues, leading to the sudden power loss and idleness, the case filer continued. 

Another class-action case was filed just after a year. The constant stalling defects caused the subsequent Chrysler Pacifica lawsuit in October 2018. Following the 2017 lawsuit, FCA recalled their customers for updating the software of minivans to solve transmission issues. However, the plaintiffs in the latter case alleged that:

  • There was no improvement in the stalling problem even after the software update. The drivers faced similar issues afterward.
  • The new software is nothing but merely a repackaged tech application, the case filer claimed, which was available before the recall. 
  • Furthermore, the lawsuit document alleged that the company was already aware of the stalling problem, but instead of addressing and solving that issue, the FCA dealership covered the symptoms or even denied the car’s power issues.

How Could a Lawsuit Help?

This lawsuit could help consumers in the following ways:

  • The court could have asked the company to extend the warranties of the Chrysler Pacifica.
  • The company might be asked to repair all the defective cars free of charge.
  • Ban the company from selling defective cars until the problem is solved.
  • The court could have asked the FCA to notify its consumers about the claimed defect.

Let’s see the remarks of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles regarding the allegations in the stalled class-action case.

FCA Statement Regarding the Lawsuit

The NHTSA has initiated an official inquiry into the Chrysler Pacifica. There were 57 complaints to the NHTSA regarding power breakdowns. All these complaints and investigations forced the FCA to take action. Finally, on January 12, 2018, the company recalled the Chrysler owners for a software update of the car. The company accepted that the stalling problem resulted from faulty software, causing the power steering to stick and increasing the chances of road accidents. As the company failed to overcome the problem, it was hit by another class action. The lawsuit was more effective and fruitful for the customers of Chrysler Pacifica. Even though the company refused all the allegations of misdeeds, FCA shook hands on the settlement. 

Chrysler Minivan Stalling Lawsuit Settlement

The Chrysler Pacifica car-stall lawsuit has reached an agreement for the models of 2017-2021. The settlement was made for the minivans supplied with 9-speed automatic transmissions and 3.6-liter V6 engines. The company has agreed to increase the warranty period of the crankshaft sensor of the minivan to five years or 60,000 miles, which was only three years previously. Moreover, the Chrysler Pacifica lawsuit causes the FCA to give reimbursements. The corporation is obliged to compensate its customers who updated their crankshaft position sensors on their own. The car owner is required to bring the repair slips to claim their refund. The settlement document mentioned that the above indemnification would only apply to those Pacifica minivans leased or purchased five years before the agreed date. 

Chrysler Pacifica car stalls have also provided Chrysler owners the benefit of replacing their cars. This class action case allowed the class members to file a lawsuit against FCA for replacing their minivans. The plaintiff can file the case in the settlement’s arbitration program depending upon the extent of the stalling defect and the claimant’s state of lemon law.

Bottom Line

Whereas the stalling defects of the Chrysler Pacifica depleted the repute of FCA, it also led to compensation orders of more than $80,000 to the attorney and $20,000 to the two claimants. The final hearing in the Chrysler Pacifica lawsuit will be held on February 15, 2023. In the event the settlement is approved, it may benefit you to opt out of the class can file an individual claim against the manufacturer for a more substantial and deserving recompense.

Please contact us if you are worried about receiving just compensation for the manufacturing faults. Our professional and experienced attorneys and case analysts at the Lemon Firm may be able to help you recover full damages for your troubles. 

Call (833)-Lemon-Firm and speak to our experts today!

On Nov. 23, 2020, General Motors LLC was named in a proposed class action lawsuit. The suit claims GM sold Ohio vehicles with engines “engineered to fail.” Failures occur due to an oil containment and combustion system that is defective. Lisa Mae Jennings, who purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Silverado, and Airko Inc. have filed a lawsuit on behalf of the clients. The Vortec 5300 engine from Generation IV powers their trucks. Many internal components of this engine wear out early due to its faulty combustion system components.

GM Engine Defects: Class Action Lawsuit Overview

A Georgia resident sues General Motors (GM) over allegedly defective engines and misleading trade practices. 

The GMC Sierra he purchased in March 2011 was equipped with a Vortec 5300 Generation IV engine. A GM dealer informed Nalley that his GMC Sierra had a fouled spark plug and oil consumption problems after he experienced an engine misfire and check engine light in 2015. However, Nalley’s request for oil consumption repairs was denied by GM. As far as Nalley is concerned, GM never told him that his car’s engine was consuming oil.

5.3-liter Vortec 5300 LC9 engines from 2011-2014 are defective in Chevrolet and GMC Sierra models. Whether the vehicle has been purchased or leased in Georgia, Nalley represents himself and a state class.

A class action lawsuit alleges that GM used deceptive trade practices, unfair business practices, breached warranties, concealed fraudulent information, and unethically enriched itself.

The Quality of GM Engines and the Future of GM

Electric cars, plug-in hybrids, and battery-powered vehicles account for much less than all new automobile sales in the US today. By 2030, EV sales in the US are anticipated to account for at least 40% of all new car sales, according to regulators and automakers. We should take advantage of this opportunity to lower greenhouse gas emissions as part of our efforts to halt climate change.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the new standards will increase electric vehicle share by about one-fifth by 2026, pushing the nation closer to its goal of fuel-efficient cars by 2026.

Reasons That Lead GM Vehicles to Go Into the Recall

A Congressional committee looking into the fatal flaw claimed that GM engineers were aware that tiny cars often had major ignition switch issues. The committee released dozens of confidential documents on Friday detailing this information. Despite several opportunities to fix these problems, they decided not to do so.

According to emails and other memos, Delphi Automotive consistently failed to meet GM specifications when testing switches.

Internal records from GM, Delphi, and a US safety organization have been disclosed, detailing many switch failures. 2.6 million vehicles were recalled by General Motors in 2022 to fix the faults. 

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce questioned GM CEO Mary Barra last week over the automaker’s tardy response to the problems of 2001. The committee has issued the first batch of about 250,000 documents.

According to committee chairman and Republican from Michigan, Fred Upton, the documents demonstrate how the system failed. Other politicians have questioned GM’s activities.

General Motors was “slow to communicate and act” on flaws and recalls, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in an email dated July 2013.

Different Class Action Lawsuits for GM Engine Problem

Lifters – including AFM or “deactivation” lifters – are being investigated for possible design or manufacturing defects. Researchers investigate whether shoddy lifters, oil aeration problems or lifter bore size issues cause the problems. Recent months have seen the internet inundated with complaints from GM customers about bad, failing, or collapsing lifters.

Class action lawsuits may allow drivers to recoup their money on vehicle repairs and replacements. Additionally, expenses for rental cars, inconveniences, loss of vehicle value, and other damage will be compensated.

GM 8-Speed Transmission Class Action Lawsuit

The eight-speed automatic gearboxes from GM’s 8L45E and 8L90 have been the focus of multiple class-action lawsuits in recent years. In an opinion piece published in 2019, GM Authority urged GM to solve these alleged issues with its eight-speed gearbox.

Accusation for GM Corvette Engine

It’s no surprise that enthusiasts jump for joy whenever GM’s LS7 engine is mentioned, as it’s a 7-liter V8. Recent GM Class Action Lawsuits 2021 filed by Corvette owners against GM reveal that using an LS7 may not all be fun and games. The Corvette Z06 and 427 models built between 2006 and 2013 are accused of having a 427 cubic inch V8 engine problem.

Legal Allegation for Chevy Bolt Battery 

On behalf of Chevrolet Bolt EV owners and lessees, Wittels McInturff Palikovic has filed a dispute with General Motors LLC (GM). GM recently disclosed that the batteries in the Bolt EV are dangerously defective.

Other allegations are made in the class action lawsuit, which is available here. In tandem with other cases made by Bolt owners around the nation, a combined complaint against General Motors and the battery manufacturer LG Electronics was filed in federal court in Michigan in September 2021.

Chevy Shake Lawsuit Class Action

Various Chevy and GMC vehicle owners are familiar with the “Chevy Shake.” Consequently, multiple lawsuits were filed between 2015 and 2019. Moreover, a new lawsuit covering 2019-2022 vehicles was filed. However, the litigation is still ongoing.

The manufacturers of popular models of GMC and Chevrolet vehicles, General Motors, have been the subject of several class-action lawsuits. The problematic cars have not been recalled by General Motors, despite numerous reports of problems with them.

Even though the manufacturers have not been entirely silent on the matter, General Motors has not been particularly active. General Motors’ lack of assistance has increased lawsuits filed as loyal customers report unresolved vehicle issues.

Conclusion: Improving Quality Is the Only Quick Fix

GM has been accused of deceit regarding the quality of its engines. Reports of engine defects date back several years. The related lawsuit is discussed above regarding different GM vehicles. Although the company has made some efforts to improve the quality of its engines, there are still many reports of problems. 

For those experiencing these issues with their General Motors truck, car or SUV but don’t have any idea to get compensation or recover their loss, please call the Lemon firm at (833). Our experienced attorneys can help you get compensation for your vehicle’s manufacturer defects. With our experience and authority to sue automotive firms, we are available around the clock to help you!

Dodge and Chrysler’s minivans are again in the news headlines for car functionality issues as the electrical issues and problems in integrated power modules occupy the history of these vehicles. The recent complaints are about the minivan sliding-door-lock defects. Probes by NHTSA and companies’ comments, along with a detailed discussion of the issues, are included in this article.

Chrysler and Dodge Minivans – The Family Admired Vehicles

Chrysler Minivan and Dodge Caravan are perfect for a large family. With the large interior volume, these minivans are considered a family favorite for easy and comfortable long drives. When it comes to purchasing a new car which feature concerns you most? The response of the majority of automobile owners is safety! Both the Dodge and Chrysler minivans are equipped with reliable and properly tested safety features. Moreover, these minivans are honored to receive various impressive safety crash test ratings that further ensure the vehicle’s safety.

The Chrysler variant model Pacifica won the best model award in 2021. It’s available with gas and a hybrid drivetrain, improving gas consumption. After consolidation with Chrysler, FCA shut down the production of some vehicles, including the Dodge Grand Caravan. Although the sales figure is quite reasonable, the Dodge caravan discontinued the production run in 2020.

Car Models with the Malfunctioning

Are all Dodge and Chrysler cars reported to have a problem? According to news sources, the problem has been detected in Chrysler Town and Country minivans and Dodge Grand Caravans manufactured between 2015 and 2019. The minivan owners face serious sliding door issues as the door lock is stuck and fails. The users alleged that the problem frequently develops within the warranty term. In addition to these models, minivans manufactured in 2001 are likewise particularly vulnerable, with repeated sliding-door problems.

Problems Addressed By the Owners – Sliding Door Lock Defects

Dodge and Chrysler minivan customers encountered the following issues:

  • The Dodge Caravan’s rear sliding doors failed to unlock, forcing the passengers to use the front door to come out of the car
  • The Chrysler Town & Country lock system acted up when it remained open and unlatched throughout the drive.
  • A Chrysler owner also reports the automatic sliding door issues; the door is closed spontaneously on the hand of the complainer after she opened it with the car remote.

These manual and automatic lock failures sparks danger in the community of the minivan holders. They are concerned about the minivan sliding door problem’s severe consequences and high safety risks. Multiple consumers lodged a complaint with the NHTSA, confirming the commonality of these incidents.

Investigation of the Problem by NHTSA

The seriousness of an issue is measured by the reaction or response of the victims. In the case of an issue under discussion, a total of 365 complaints were filed against the Chrysler and Dodge minivan door lock defects. The owners asserted that each or two sliding door locks of the 2016 Towing & Country Chryslers models and Dodge Caravans were defective and fell over prematurely. Have you ever experienced the minivan sliding door problem? Like dozens of others, if you have suffered too, there is good news then!

The Investigation office started its scrutiny regarding the defects on July 2021. After a thorough inspection of the minivan sliding door problem, the NHTSA discovered that 99 percent of the vehicles in question had reached their expiry time. The subjected minivans were at the age where breakdowns are common. Furthermore, the probe noted that 96 percent of the Dodge and Chrysler minivan sliding door issues arose before 2020 when the cars had been operating for around four years. In concluding remarks, the NHTSA said they did not find any causality, injury, or crash report. However, they will continue to look into the matter for the safety and security of the civilians.

FCA’S Steps Regarding the Minivan Sliding Door Problem

Customers are the backbone of any company. A company’s customers play a central role in its success. Whether a small retailer or a large enterprise, its customers have a core value in the developmental journey of the company. Therefore, listening to and solving your clients’ issues should be one of the prime goals of any company.

Considering these facts, the minivan companies also contributed to addressing and resolving the sliding door issues.

In their first move, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) directed the dealers of the company to change sliding door lock actuators rather than the whole lock system or latch assemblies. FCA gave these instructions through the technical service bulletin issued in June 2020.

Owners have complained further about the vivid buzzing sound produced by the 2016 Chrysler and Dodge minivan door lock functions. To compensate for this sliding door issue, the company has certified its warranty extension for the sliding door lock actuators for 1 million miles or 15 years. This deal was only valid on Dodge and Chrysler’s minivans manufactured from May 1, 2015, to January 9, 2017. Chrysler has also begun informing customers of their new program, which would repay the repair costs initially paid by the minivan owners.

What to Do When You Face Sliding Door Issues?

Have you ever experienced the Chrysler and Dodge minivan door lock breakdown? Sliding door issues are no doubt troublesome incidents and have high safety concerns. Fixing these problems is mandatory to avoid any unwanted encounters.

Following are some of the suggestions to cope with the minivan sliding door problems:

  • Carefully observe your vehicle at the time of lock issue.
  • Take your minivan immediately to the authorized Dodge or Chrysler dealership for repair.
  • Ensure that the approved service dealership appropriately documented your entire case in their record. 
  • Take and secure all the copies of repair receipts.

At the Lemon Firm, our experienced Attorneys have been able to successfully recover compensation for our clients who were sold a vehicle with manufacturer defects, and we can do the same for you. Call (833) Lemon-Firm to speak with a Lemon law expert today.

Have you ever wondered that industrial giants and big brands can also get sued for their actions? If you are a fan of fancy and stylish bikes, you must know the iconic motorcycle company – Harley-Davidson. This article covers some recent lawsuits against the company for breaching its customers’ rights.

About the Company

Harley-Davidson is an American-based automotive epitome that produces cruiser, custom, and touring motorcycles. The stylish designs and powered engines of the motorcycle has been fascinating the bikers for about 120 years of the company’s history. Harley-Davidson operates in Motorcycles and associated products as well as in the Financial Services sections. The first segment deals with the designing, production, and vending of traveling motorcycles and their parts. In addition, Harley-Davidson manufacture and release its merchandise containing clothes, scale models, video games, and other accessories under the first section. Financial services mostly entail consumer loans for making purchases.

Harley-Davidson originated by William Sylvester Harley along with childhood friends in 1903. It took only 20 years for the company to reach on top of the industry. It became the globe’s largest motorcycle producer after beating its historic rivals – Indian Motors. Today the headquarters of Harley – Davidson is in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States operating and producing amazing and high-quality motorcycles.

What Is A Class Action In The USA?

A class action is a judicial procedure that allows plaintiffs, who may be one or larger in number, to file a lawsuit and persecute it in court in place of a larger group of people called a Class. People in the class are ones who experience similar problems at the hands of the defendants, these individuals are called Class Members. This procedure helps the court to manage the workload of lawsuits as it minimizes the class members as plaintiffs. Class action has different types. For example, Federal security class action comprises a group of shareholders. As per rule 23 of FRDP, the representative of the group has filed a lawsuit.

Class Actions against Harley-Davidson from 2008 To 2010

The lawsuit was filed by Ronald Garcia for the defective braking system of Harley motorcycles in California Court. The touring and CVO models made from 2008 to 2010 were installed with an Anti-lock braking system (ABS). However, the class action argued that the ABS had major operational issues. Garcia’s lawsuit demonstrated that the flawed design can cause the wheels to lock, owing to the separation of cables between the engine control unit and speed sensors. Because of the non-functioning ABS, anyone can lose control of their Harley, and the danger of death and injury increases.

Little Action from Harley Davidson

Garcia’s case action tried to represent the Harley buyers and lessees’ class nationwide and a small group of people in California. In 2011, the company found out the imperfections of the Anti-lock braking system in Harley-bikes and started fixing them. However, the Plaintiff of this case proclaims that the company knew about their defects many moons ago.

“Right to repair” Lawsuits against Harley-Davidson In 2022 Case Background

Although Harley-Davidson is a well-admired company for decades. It is alleged for damaged parts and unnecessary elevated repair costs.

Problems Faced By the Customers

The Harley bike owners faced the following difficulties that have been challenged in court several times:

  • The company restricts its customers to purchase company-owned motorcycle parts for repair.
  • Harley-Davidson conditions its consumers to utilize company-authorized repair services only.
  • The company warns its users to refrain from the third party for repair, otherwise, they will void their motorcycle’s warranty.
  • In the mentioned scenarios, Harley-Davidson is selling overpriced products and high-cost repair services.
  • Customers claim that the company denies them the right to repair their motorcycles.

Case Actions

At the start of this august, two class actions were filed against the company regarding their customers’ rights. These federal lawsuits assert that the US motorcycle manufacturer – Harley-Davidson abducts the right to repair of its customers. The company compels its consumers to pay exorbitant maintenance costs by restricting where and how they might have their vehicles repaired.

The first lawsuit, filed in California, claimed that the company defy the state competition law and other official acts. The second case was filed in Wisconsin federal court alleged the company of violating federal antitrust laws. Thomas Burnt, the plaintiff’s lawyer, claims that Harley-Davidson has retained a greater portion of the parts market and charged higher costs for the repair of its motorcycles. The bike producers unlawfully utilized its warranty by forcing bike owners to use branded parts. The representatives of both the cases did not receive any comment from Harley-Davidson neither the company representatives appear in front of the court.

The Federal Trade Commission Action

After all the class actions, the FTC took action against Harley-Davidson for breaching its consumers’ right to repair. FTC lay a claim to Harley- Davidson that the company break the MMW–Act by linking the bike’s warranty with the obligation to purchase the company-made part of the bike for repair. Furthermore, the FTC argues that Harley – Davidson failed to properly reveal all of its warranty conditions single document, forcing customers to visit an authorized dealership for complete information.

In response to these allegations, the FTC gave the following orders to Harley-Davidson:

  • Gave the due rights to the company’s consumers by mentioning the following clearly in its warranty. “Taking your bikes to a repair facility that is not associated with or approved by Harley – Davidson, will not cancel this warranty. Utilizing non-branded components will also not invalidate this warranty.”
  • Abide complete by the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA). Otherwise, each violation could cost them a penalty of $46,517.
  • Inform consumers that their warranties will be honored even if they purchase aftermarket components or use independent repair companies. Moreover, order the company part dealers to stop promoting Harley parts over the third party.

The Final Settlement

A settlement was made between FTC and Harley-Davidson at last. The company ensures that the warranty of the Harley motorcycle owners would not be voided if they utilize third-party motor parts for repair. However, they claimed that it will not offer any warranty to the damaged bikes due to defective aftermarket parts and unauthorized services.

At the Lemon Firm, our experienced Attorneys have been able to successfully recover compensation for our clients who were sold a vehicle with manufacturer defects, and we can do the same for you. Call (833) Lemon-Firm to speak with a Lemon law expert today.

If you are looking to buy a new vehicle but are on a tight budget, a certified pre-owned (CPO) car can be a good idea. It could save you some money and will afford you the luxury of having the extension of the manufacturer’s warranty.

Some automakers introduced the CPO program in the early 1990s. Many vehicles were returning to dealerships in excellent condition, so manufacturers decided to resell the cars with detailed inspections, reconditioning, extended warranties, extra perks, and added peace of mind instead for perspective buyers.

What Is a Certified Pre-Owned Vehicle?

Unlike a used vehicle, a certified pre-owned car undergoes a mandatory inspection and should be refurbished to factory standards by technicians. Different dealerships have different conditions for their quality inspection but generally make sure that the car is in top-notch condition before putting it on sale. They also give you an extension of the manufacturer warranty coverage and piece of mind of the car’s new-like condition.

How Much Does a Certified Pre-owned Vehicle Cost?

CPO vehicles generally cost more than used vehicles as they undergo a thorough inspection and refurbishing process. They also come with a manufacturer-backed warranty that may include extra perks like free maintenance, free roadside assistance, and a complimentary loaner vehicle.

Right now, we are seeing a hike in used car pricing compared to last year and it’s hard to get an affordable used car of any kind. So do good research before investing in a vehicle.

Is There Value in A Certified Pre-owned Vehicle? 

The present car market is growing like the housing market. We are already seeing 10% higher pricing than last year. Looking at the raw figures, people are investing more in used cars than new ones. 

The used car market is huge and CPO cars are a small part of it. For now, the used-vehicle market has a 48-day supply and average prices are nearly $20,000 less than a new car. Certified pre-owned cars have mileage limits and look attractive with good enough shape and extended warranty. These cars are usually late models off-lease cars with less than 40,000 miles. Let’s see some CPO practices these days:

Older, High-Mileage Vehicles

We are seeing older and high mileage cars being labeled as certified pre-owned cars these days. In the coming months, Nissan will certify non-Nissan vehicles with a six-year/60000-mile warranty than the seven-year/100,000-mile warranty that Nissan vehicles get. General Motors is launching Car Bravo, a new consumer CPO service to certify any brand’s vehicle. 

Ford is selling all brand vehicles under its Blue Advantage program for up to 120,000 miles and offers a 14-day/1000-mile return policy. Honda is certifying 10-year-old cars with no mileage limits under its Honda True Used program. More manufacturers will soon start selling old, high mileage vehicles to cash in on the present demand.

Fewer Quality Checks, Potentially Higher Risk

Certified Pre-owned vehicles are supposed to undergo a thorough quality inspection where the dealership will check off nearly 200 items on the paper. The automaker sets the audit rules and practices, but CPO vehicles don’t get inspected by factory employees. 

Depending on dealership diligence, a CPO vehicle still could have underlying issues that were present at the time of trade in so it still may be worth your while to bring to a mechanic to diagnosis prior to purchase. Manufacturers are introducing high-mileage CPO programs in multiple tiers of CPO cars with separate names—and they each have wildly varying certification requirements. Not all CPO’s are created equal.

For example, Honda now has three CPO labels (Honda True Used, Honda True Certified, Honda True Certified+) all with different warranty coverages and age limitations. Ford has a 139-point inspection on Blue Certified vehicles vs the 172 points on Gold Certified vehicles.

So not all are right for every buyer, and you may be better off with a brand new car than a used car. It’s the most discouraging buyer’s market in decades so if you’re going for a certified pre-owned car, make sure to check everything thoroughly.

Have A Lemon Vehicle? Talk With Us Now

If you are an automobile owner and have manufacturing issues, you can contact us regarding your involvement in this or any potential class-action lawsuit. Serious vehicle problems require serious legal representation, especially when you are bringing a claim against a major automaker. 

At the Lemon Firm, our experienced Attorneys have been able to successfully recover compensation for our clients who were sold a vehicle with manufacturer defects, and we can do the same for you. Call (833) Lemon-Firm to speak with a Lemon law expert today.