A recurring problem under the California Lemon Law is a defect that persists after repair attempts. It does not need to occur every time you drive, but it must show a pattern that affects the vehicle’s use, value, or safety.

If you have taken your vehicle in multiple times for the same issue and it keeps coming back, it may qualify as a recurring defect. The difficulty often comes when dealerships say they cannot replicate the problem.

What Counts as a Recurring Problem Under California Lemon Law?

A recurring problem generally means the same defect has undergone multiple repair attempts without a lasting fix. While the law does not set a strict number in every case, common benchmarks include:

  • Two or more repair attempts for a safety-related issue
  • Four or more repair attempts for a non-safety defect
  • About 30 or more days out of service for repairs

The focus is on whether the issue substantially affects how the vehicle operates. Even if the problem disappears temporarily, it may still qualify if it returns.

Examples of recurring problems include:

  • Engine stalling that happens again after repairs
  • Electrical malfunctions that intermittently disable systems
  • Transmission slipping that returns over time
  • Warning lights that reset but come back on

If you are repeatedly addressing the same concern, it may be considered one ongoing defect.

Does the Problem Have to Be Constant?

No. Many lemon law claims involve intermittent issues.

A defect can still be recurring if it:

  • Happens under certain conditions
  • Appears unpredictably
  • Comes and goes over time

For example, a vehicle that stalls only after long drives or displays warning lights sporadically may still qualify. What matters is the pattern, not how often it appears.

Why Dealerships Say “Could Not Duplicate”

Repair invoices often include “could not duplicate,” meaning the technician did not observe the issue during inspection.

This can happen when:

  • The problem occurs under specific driving conditions
  • The issue is intermittent
  • The test drive is too short to trigger the defect

This notation does not mean the issue is not real. It only reflects what the technician observed at that moment.

If you have multiple service visits with the same complaint, even without confirmation, it helps show a pattern.

Does “Could Not Duplicate” Still Count?

Yes, it can. A visit may still count as a repair attempt if:

  • You clearly reported the issue
  • The dealership had the opportunity to diagnose or repair it
  • The problem continued afterward

Repeated visits with similar complaints, even when labeled “could not duplicate,” can support a lemon law claim. The record shows the issue persisted over time.

How to Document a Recurring Problem

Clear documentation can strengthen your claim, especially with intermittent defects.

Focus on consistency and detail:

  • Describe the issue the same way each visit
  • Keep all repair orders, even when no fix was made
  • Track when the problem occurs, including driving conditions
  • Take photos or videos when the issue appears
  • Bring the vehicle in promptly after noticing the problem

A consistent record makes it easier to show that the defect is ongoing, even if the dealership could not reproduce it.

When Does a Recurring Problem Become a Lemon?

A recurring issue may qualify as a lemon when the manufacturer has had a reasonable opportunity to fix it but has not done so.

This often involves:

  • Multiple unsuccessful repair attempts
  • Ongoing problems affecting safety or reliability
  • Significant time out of service

If your vehicle continues to return to the shop for the same issue, you may already be within this range.

When Repeated Repairs Point to a Larger Issue

Recurring problems are often dismissed as minor or hard to replicate. Over time, they can lead to repeated inconvenience and ongoing payments for a vehicle that does not function as expected.

We work with California drivers to review repair histories, identify patterns, and determine whether a claim may be appropriate. If your vehicle has been in and out of the shop for the same issue, it may be time to take the next step.

Contact The Lemon Firm to discuss your situation and learn whether your recurring vehicle problem may qualify under California Lemon Law.

About the Author
Sepehr Daghighian is a partner with CCA that is well-versed in all aspects of lemon-law litigation. A 2005 graduate of Loyola Law School, Mr. Daghighian has been practicing litigation throughout the state of California for over 13-years. In this time, Mr. Daghighian has advocated on behalf of California consumers in hundreds of lemon law cases throughout our great state. Mr. Daghighian has also successfully tried numerous such cases to verdict in both Federal and State Court.