Manufacturers sometimes delay lemon law claims by slowing communication, repeating steps, or avoiding clear decisions. If your claim seems to stall without a clear reason, it may be a sign that the manufacturer is buying time rather than resolving your case.

What Does “Stalling” Look Like in a Lemon Law Claim?

Most California lemon law claims follow a predictable path: repair attempts, documentation review, and a decision about a buyback or replacement. When that process drags on without progress, it often means something is off.

Stalling does not always look dramatic. In many cases, it shows up as small delays that add up. You may notice longer response times, vague updates, or repeated requests for information you have already provided.

Common Manufacturer Stalling Tactics

Some delays are legitimate. Parts can be backordered, and scheduling can take time. But certain patterns tend to signal intentional delay rather than normal processing.

Here are some of the most common tactics:

  • Repeated repair attempts without resolution
    The manufacturer may encourage additional repairs even when prior attempts failed to fix the issue.
  • Requests for duplicate documentation
    You may be asked to resend repair orders, purchase documents, or correspondence you have already provided.
  • Unclear or shifting requirements
    The manufacturer changes what it needs to move forward, which keeps resetting the timeline.
  • Delays in assigning a case manager
    Your claim may sit without a clear point of contact, making it harder to get updates.
  • Extended “review” periods
    The claim has been under review for weeks or months with no meaningful update.
  • Pushing you toward informal resolutions
    You may be encouraged to accept another repair or a goodwill offer instead of pursuing a buyback.

If you are seeing more than one of these at the same time, it is worth taking a closer look at how your claim is being handled.

What Should You Track While Your Claim Is Pending?

Documentation plays a major role in identifying delay patterns and supporting your claim if you need to escalate.

We recommend keeping a clear record of:

  • All repair orders and invoices
    Make sure each visit is documented with dates, mileage, and reported issues.
  • Communication logs
    Save emails, letters, and notes from phone calls, including dates and who you spoke with.
  • Timeline of events
    Track when you submitted your claim, when the manufacturer responded, and any gaps in communication.
  • Requests from the manufacturer
    Keep a record of what they ask for and when you provide it.
  • Vehicle downtime
    Note how long your car has been out of service due to repairs.

This information helps show whether delays are reasonable or part of a broader pattern.

When Do Delays Cross the Line?

A slow process does not automatically mean your rights are being violated. However, delays may become a problem when they prevent your claim from moving forward in a meaningful way.

You may want to consider escalation if:

  • Your claim has been pending for an extended period with no decision
  • The manufacturer keeps requesting the same information
  • Repairs continue without fixing the issue
  • Communication becomes inconsistent or stops altogether

At that point, it may no longer be productive to wait for the manufacturer to act on its own.

How Escalation Can Move a Claim Forward

Escalation does not always mean going straight to court. In many cases, it involves shifting how the claim is handled.

This may include:

  • Formal legal representation to communicate with the manufacturer
  • A structured demand for repurchase or replacement
  • Preparing the case for arbitration or litigation, if needed

Once a claim is clearly supported by documentation and presented in a more formal way, manufacturers often respond more directly.

Don’t Let Delays Define the Outcome

If your lemon law claim feels stuck, it may not resolve on its own. Patterns of delay can affect how long you are without a reliable vehicle and how quickly you receive a resolution.

At The Lemon Firm, we work with California drivers to evaluate stalled claims, organize documentation, and push for a clear outcome. If you are dealing with ongoing delays, contact us to review your situation and discuss the next step.

About the Author
Sepehr Daghighian is a partner with CCA that is well-versed in all aspects of lemon-law litigation. A 2005 graduate of Loyola Law School, Mr. Daghighian has been practicing litigation throughout the state of California for over 13-years. In this time, Mr. Daghighian has advocated on behalf of California consumers in hundreds of lemon law cases throughout our great state. Mr. Daghighian has also successfully tried numerous such cases to verdict in both Federal and State Court.