Author: admin

Fisker has a dramatic history. From declaring bankruptcy, to selling assets to China. The company has seen it all.

But what does it look like today? How can this complex company still operate, and have they produced cars? We’re here to find out.

History of Fisker

The Fisker name was born from the founder, Henrik Fisker, a Danish automotive entrepreneur, and designer. The company was founded in 2007 and produced its first vehicle, the Karma, four years later. The Karma was branded as a “plug-in range extender” which meant an engine charges the battery instead of turning the wheels.

Soon after production began Fisker’s battery supplier, A123 Systems went bankrupt and ceased production of the Karma model. There are estimated to be less than 2,500 Karma’s ever produced and ultimately it was a test run to see if a new hybrid, range extender technology could work.

After the Fisker assets were sold in 2014 to China’s Wanxiang Group, Henrik embarked on another adventure to revive the brand. Fast forward to 2020, four years after “Fisker Inc” was born we see the brand entering the NYSE with a SPAC merger funded by private equity firm Apollo Global Management, as Fisker retained trademarks and naming rights.

With a setup in San Francisco, HQ in Manhattan Beach Los Angeles, software development in India, and a production site in China, Fisker has spread its wings to become a serious automaker, mass producing its first vehicle, the Ocean.

The Fisker Ocean

Fisker announced in 2019 a cutting-edge all-electric SUV that would be released in 2021 -the Fisker Ocean was born. Now we are coming to the end of 2023, the Ocean has just entered mass production, with partner Magna Steyr producing just over 3,000 vehicles (as of early September).

The Ocean looks like a blend of a Kia Niro, Rivian, and Range Rover and has rugged design features. With one of the thinnest rear lights on the market, it turns an eye with its flat rear end, intuitive solar panels, and aero wheels.

Integrated solar panels form part of the Ocean’s core philosophy, Fisker estimates the panels will produce over 1,000 miles of free range per year just using the sun. With sustainable material choices throughout including recycled carpets and plastic bottles with other polymers forming the interior materials.

A range of battery sizes and trim levels are available with the largest Extreme edition equipped with a 113kWh battery translating to 360 miles of EPA range. The Ocean Extreme comes to a starting MSRP of around $70,000, which could be considered expensive. But Fisker has promised a starter Ocean Sport model from just under $40,000.
Fisker Warranty Summary

Fisker has a lot to learn as a new brand. With warranties providing coverage for specific components or aspects of a vehicle for a specified period or mileage limit, depending on which event occurs first.

For example, the Basic New Vehicle Limited Warranty covers the vehicle for 6 years or 60,000 miles, whichever comes first. The High Voltage Battery Limited Warranty covers the high voltage battery for 10 years or 100,000 miles, or until the battery reaches a 75% state of health. The warranties vary in coverage, duration, and conditions, protecting different parts of the vehicle.

Customer Issues that resulted in the Vice President’s visit.

The owner of the 1,032nd Fisker Ocean unit faced several issues, including the inability to engage gears other than Park, random forceful braking, a low-quality key fob, non-functional A/C vents, and a malfunctioning “California Mode” (a feature that opens all windows). They contacted Fisker’s support team, and after posting their grievances on Reddit and mentioning invoking Lemon Law, Fisker responded promptly.

Fisker’s senior vice-president personally contacted the owner, sent a team of engineers and a technician to address the problems, and engaged in a comprehensive discussion. Temporary workarounds and fixes were provided for some issues, while plans for potential recalls and part replacements were discussed.

This proactive approach to addressing customer concerns is part of Fisker’s strategy to cater to early adopters and maintain a positive image in the competitive electric vehicle industry.
What if this happens to you?

While a team of engineers and even the vice president of Fisker are involved, many owners continue to be unhappy with the solutions provided by automakers. These problems have the potential to escalate into further legal action, underlining the importance of protecting consumer rights.

If you struggle with vehicle troubles and feel cornered against vehicle brands, remember it is always better to have experts with you. With extensive experience and successful cases at hand, The Lemon Firm is your best bet. With the dedicated team members always at your disposal, the package becomes too good to be true. So, if your car is giving you a headache, don’t hesitate to reach out!

Call 833 Lemon Firm and speak with a case analyst today!

Data Breach, Recalls, and promises of unlimited supercharging. These are just some of the reasons why Tesla is facing backlash from their owners. Let’s explore the main lawsuits and how it has affected Tesla owners who are left frustrated and angry with the American automaker.

Company Data Breaches

In May 2023 Tesla faced a data breach where thousands of people’s information had been accessed. There could have been better measures to prevent the breach according to reports and any person who provides access to their data should have full confidence that Tesla is handling the data securely.

False Supercharging Promises

Buyers purchased a Model S or X expecting to receive 3 years of unlimited supercharging, but this was not the case. Despite being advertised, Tesla pulled the plug on this offer causing upset to owners who were waiting in line for free charging. There were claims that marketing campaigns provided evidence that the offer was still in place. The class action lawsuit states that “Plaintiff would not have purchased a unit of the products or would have paid a substantially lower price if he had known that the advertising as described herein was false, misleading and deceptive”.

Software Update Affecting Performance

According to reports out of California, Tesla requested a judge to dismiss claims of reduced performance of their Model X and S vehicles after a software update. A lawsuit that’s been lingering on the automaker for a while, Tesla feels that there is no conclusive evidence that performance was reduced from the update. 

Potentially Dangerous Recall for Model X Owners

After a recall earlier this year, Tesla claimed the brake fluid sensors were not calibrated correctly, affecting 54,676 vehicles. The recall claims that “A vehicle controller that does not correctly indicate low brake fluid levels to the customer may impact braking performance and may increase the risk of a collision”. 

The term “recall” has received backlash from Elon Musk if the repair can be resolved with a software update, as was the case with this brake fluid sensor issue. Despite not needing to physically visit a workshop for repair, it would still constitute a “recall” if the parts of the vehicle were not functioning as they should.

Do You Have a Faulty Vehicle? Take Back Control

You could be one of the many Tesla owners facing the same issues with their performance and updates. Many owners continue to be unhappy with the solutions provided by automakers. These problems have the potential to escalate into further legal action, underlining the importance of protecting consumer rights.

If you struggle with vehicle troubles and feel cornered against big vehicle brands, remember it is always better to have experts with you. With extensive experience and successful cases at hand, The Lemon Firm is your best bet. With the dedicated team members always at your disposal, the package becomes too good to be true. So, if your car is giving you a headache, don’t hesitate to reach out!

Call 833 Lemon Firm and speak with a case analyst today!

California duo was left with a faulty gearbox after just 3 years of ownership.

When buying their new Honda Odyssey in February 2018, California owners Kevin and Anita loved their new purchase. After all, the Honda brand is known for reliability. However, only 3 years later the transmission started to fail.

The Symptoms of the Faulty Transmission

The 9-speed auto transmission, designed and manufactured by ZF, a renowned player in the transmission space, made the driving experience a nightmare. The Honda began jumping back and forth and delayed in shifting gears when driving under 40mph.

Honda Transmission Failure and Possible Causes

The transmission issues are caused by “improper design and/or calibration of the software in control of the transmission, including the transmission and powertrain control modules.” According to the two Honda customers who filed the lawsuit.

How the Owners Tried to Fix the Transmission

Kevin and Anita took their intermittent Honda to a dedicated dealer for investigation. The Honda technicians found no problems and therefore no repairs took place. However being just out of the original manufacturer’s warranty, the complainants had to fork out $218 for the diagnosis.

After the transmission problems were brushed aside, the couple experienced worse issues again in July 2023. Where the transmission “bucked, lagged, illuminated a warning light, shifted into neutral without driver input, and prevented the vehicle’s drive gear from being engaged.” According to the 2 owners.

This meant the transmission had to be replaced, after further shop visits, to diagnose what was an “internal gear failure”, costing the couple over $7,000. Allegedly this still hadn’t fixed the problem…

The lawsuit claims Honda knows about the transmission issue and put in place measures to fix it.

However, the lawsuit claims the fixes do not work.

Experiencing Vehicle Problems Like This? How You Can Take Back Control

There could be many Honda owners facing the same issue with their transmission. While repairs and fixes have been initiated, many owners continue to be unhappy with the solutions provided by automakers. These problems have the potential to escalate into further legal action, underlining the importance of protecting consumer rights.

If you struggle with vehicle troubles and feel cornered against big vehicle brands, remember it is always better to have experts with you. With extensive experience and successful cases at hand, The Lemon Firm is your best bet. With the dedicated team members always at your disposal, the package becomes too good to be true. So, if your car is giving you a headache, don’t hesitate to reach out!

Call 833 Lemon Firm and speak with a case analyst today!

Owners are unhappy with an otherwise extremely useful feature on Ford and Lincoln models.

Despite being recalled, Ford has not fixed the problem with 360-degree cameras according to several owners who filed class action lawsuits against the US car maker.

What are the Symptoms of the Faulty 360-degree camera?

The backup camera screen shows nothing, appearing black or blue, with the 360-degree camera experiencing glitches.

These affect the following models:

  • 2020-2023 Ford Explorer
  • 2020-2023 Lincoln Aviator
  • 2020-2023 Lincoln Corsair

History of the Recall and Lawsuit

The class action claims Ford knew about the issues and has done so since February 2021. This is after there have been more than 3,400 warranty claims for 360-degree cameras since April 2018 and August this year, even causing two crashes.

The vehicles affected were recalled by Ford, as per usual procedure, and fixed in September 2021 and again in January 2023 after a further 17 collisions. The third claim followed a few months later after 422,000 models were affected, including the Ford Explorer, Lincoln Aviator, and Lincoln Corsair. Finally, in September 2023 the fourth and final claim to date included Lincoln Aviator, Lincoln Navigator, Ford Transit, and Ford Bronco vehicles all having faulty 360-degree cameras.

What Ford Claim is the Issue with 360 Degree Camera

Ford claims, in the most recent recall, that the 360-degree cameras had image processing module software issues. Ford also claims the 360-degree camera screens may turn black or blue due to poor wiring retention and the camera’s hardware.

Experiencing Camera Problems? How You Can Take Back Control

Due to the recall claims in this case, many owners are facing the same issue with their 360-degree cameras. While many repairs and fixes have been initiated, owners continue to be unhappy with the solutions provided by Ford. These problems have the potential to escalate into further legal action, underlining the importance of protecting consumer rights.

If you struggle with vehicle troubles and feel cornered against big vehicle brands, remember it is always better to have experts with you. With extensive experience and successful cases at hand, The Lemon Firm is your best bet. With the dedicated team members always at your disposal, the package becomes too good to be true. So, if your car is giving you a headache, don’t hesitate to reach out!

Call 833 Lemon Firm and speak with a case analyst today!

Bosch fuel pumps allegedly caused Ford Power Stroke diesel engines to fail, leaving owners in despair and filing a class action lawsuit.

After numerous recalls and issues with Ford’s big trucks, the latest claim involves a design flaw in the Bosch-made pump and the formula of US diesel, causing one owner over $12,000 in repairs.

History of the Fuel Pump Defect

The Bosch CP4 fuel pump fitted in 2011-present 6.7L Power Stroke Diesel engines amongst Ford trucks contain metal parts that rub against each other. This rubbing causes friction and shaves off metal filings that feed through the fuel systems causing havoc.

The cause of the friction is apparently due to the US diesel used in these engines. The construction of US diesel means that it has no lubrication properties. Unlike diesel manufactured for other regions, US diesel causes the breakdown of the fuel pump internals.
Why the fuel pump lawsuit was filed.

David Clark, the owner of a 2020 F-350 claimed his 6.7L Power Stroke unit failed and entered limp mode after only 23,000 miles and within the first year of ownership. The unit then stalled and failed to start. This resulted in David taking his truck to a Ford dealership, where the failing fuel pump was detected.

Ford allegedly mistakenly denied David coverage of this under warranty which meant he was $12,838 out of pocket. Along with the towing costs, David was losing income every hour the vehicle was off the road.

Do you Have a Faulty Vehicle? Take Back Control

There could be many Ford owners facing the same issue with their Bosch fuel pump. Many owners like David continue to be unhappy with the solutions provided by automakers. These problems have the potential to escalate into further legal action, underlining the importance of protecting consumer rights.

If you struggle with vehicle troubles and feel cornered against big vehicle brands, remember it is always better to have experts with you. With extensive experience and successful cases at hand, The Lemon Firm is your best bet. With the dedicated team members always at your disposal, the package becomes too good to be true. So, if your car is giving you a headache, don’t hesitate to reach out!

Call 833 Lemon Firm and speak with a case analyst today!

Ram trucks have seen a considerable number of recalls over the past few years based on electrical system problems, faulty fuel pumps, and airbag inflators. Two more recalls were issued in June 2022 by Stellantis concerning the backup camera problem. The defect is in the trailer reverse steering control module (TRSCM), resulting in a blank camera display while reversing the car. The inability of a backup camera to display images could lead to a crash.

Details of the Recall

The Ram truck backup camera recall involves approximately 337,000 vehicles. There are two recalls regarding the backup camera issue: the first recall was in November 2021, which states that the defect prevents the camera from forming a rearview image under certain conditions. The camera fails to form an image due to software in the R1 high radio of the Ram truck. 

In the second recall, the issue is in the trailer steering system, which is meant to help the driver during backing up when the trailer is attached. Some vehicle owners notice a warning light showing in connection with the vehicle’s electric throttle control situated just behind the steering wheel. The following Ram truck models are included in the recall:

  • Ram 1500 pickup trucks launched between the 25th of June 2021 and 2nd of August 2023.
  • Ram 2500 pickup trucks launched between the 7th of August 2021 and the 27th of August 2023. 
  • Ram 3500 cab chassis trucks launched between the 10th of December 2021 and the 27th of June 2023.

How to Fix the Issue?

The Ram dealerships will mail the recall letter on the 17th of November, 2023, to the owners of all recalled vehicles. The dealers will inspect the issue and resolve it without charging any money to the owners. Stellantis is bound to repay all the expenses spent already for fixing the issue by the owners of the Ram trucks that are included in the recall. Moreover, the company will also cover the losses and repairs related to the issue.

How to Check Your Vehicle for Recall?

You will receive the notice from Stellantis via mail, which states the problem and instructions the owner should follow to get the solution. If you don’t receive the email and are unsure whether your vehicle is included in the recall, contact Ram customer service at (800) 853-1403. The LLC number for this recall is 97A, and the NHTSA number is 23V654.

Enter your 17-digit VIN into the NHTSA website. If your truck appears, it means it is included in the recall. On the other hand, if your truck doesn’t appear, it means it is currently not included in the recall. As several recalls are initiated simultaneously, it is recommended to check regularly on the website for an update.

Bottom Line

The Ram trucks involved in this recall have an issue with the backup camera that is associated with the radio software. The display image is not formed, which makes it difficult for the driver to reverse the truck. This put the truck at risk of hitting walls, poles, other vehicles, and even people.

If you find yourself grappling with Any uncertainties relating to your Dodge truck, call (833) Lemon-Firm for legal assistance. Your legal matter is in expert hands. Our experienced attorneys can help you successfully resolve these problems and recover compensation.

Ford trucks equipped with the 6.7L Power Stroke diesel engine are making headlines. As an owner of a Ford vehicle, you may already be aware of the ongoing situation. The root cause of the problem lies with the CP4 fuel pumps, which have been reported since 2011. This has led owners to face costly repairs, engine failures, and financial distress. However, there is still hope for resolution through a legal battle. The class action lawsuit filed against these issues could provide relief for you. Let’s explore this in detail!

Defective CP4 Fuel Pumps

The primary issue concerning CP4 fuel pumps in 2011-present Ford diesel trucks is the presence of metal components that experience friction, leading to the production of damaging metal shavings. These shavings disrupt not only the fuel system but also the engine, an expensive repair if post warranty. For instance, a Texas plaintiff, David Clark, had to pay about $10,000 to repair his vehicle’s engine. After Clark discovered the CP4 pump was indeed the issue, Ford denied his warranty claim for the engine and related costs. This was very concerning to other owners, too.

Owners’ Journey to Justice

Another problem the owners face is the type of diesel fuel used in the USA. The fuel doesn’t provide the required lubrication to CP4 pumps. This results in further complications, as critical components such as the cam and rollers gradually deteriorate. The “Ford Super Duty” has been subjected to various lawsuits due to such issues. Some pickup trucks had troubles, like roof crush and the “death wobble.” Also, its power tailgates didn’t work, and there were problems with its diesel emissions. Owners have joined forces to address these problems through legal means by initiating a class-action lawsuit.

Signs to Look For

Here are some common signs to be mindful of when it comes to detecting issues with CP4 fuel pumps:

  • Notice any abnormal sounds from the engine that you didn’t hear before.
  • If your truck experiences reduced power and no longer performs at its previous level.
  • Watch out for hard starting, rough idle, and loss of power.
  • Beware of fuel leaks, low fuel pressure, and metal particles in the fuel system.
  • Pay attention to warning lights or messages on your dashboard.

Lawsuit Claims

In the lawsuit, it is asserted that the pump’s design mandates a cam and two pumping cylinders, each featuring its own rollers. The expectation is that these elements should seamlessly operate without interruptions, shifting, or adhering. Also, the diesel fuel in the United States lacks sufficient lubrication, resulting in rapid wear and tear of the cam and rollers. This, in turn, leads to the generation of additional metal shavings. The class action lawsuit asserts that an engine replacement is ineffective due to the detrimental impact of U.S. diesel fuel, which can lead to the deterioration of a newly installed engine.

Legal Roadmap for Owners

Now, you know everything about the highlighted issue with your Ford Super Duty CP4 fuel pumps. It’s time to keep a keen check on your engine’s performance by watching out for the abovementioned signs. 

If you’re facing such issues, seek expert assistance from Lemon Firm. We’ll provide you with a clear legal strategy. Lemon Firm specializes in cases like yours and has a well-established history of success. Our mission is to safeguard your rights and guide you toward a just resolution.

For professional support with your claim, contact one of our case analysts today at 833-lemonfirm.

With the soaring popularity of electric vehicles, challenges come hand in hand. Lucid Motors and Rivian EV owners have recently been experiencing a range of vehicle-related issues. But despite these setbacks, many consumers are still satisfied. The reports of challenges faced by various people provide insight into the transitional phase; these startups are passing through. The promise of a greener future and sustainable transportation seems to outweigh the obstacles along the way.

Lucid Motors Troubles

According to the complaints filed on the NHTSA website and other online forums, the electric vehicle (EV) startup, Lucid Motors, faced some issues with Lucid Air. Owners have experienced gear shifting issues, seat movement malfunctions, loss of motive power, drive system faults, charging glitches, and range issues. Complaints include instances of vehicles moving in the opposite direction of the selected gear and seats moving unexpectedly. 

Recently, a San Diego-based Lucid Air owner encountered a gear-shifting problem. Lucid Motors must refine its electric vehicles. Seat movement malfunctions cause inconvenience to the drivers and pose potential dangers. Loss of motive power and drive system faults lead to unexpected breakdowns. While charging glitches and range issues limit the vehicle’s usability.

The Lucid EVs warranty covers the following components:

  • Basic Vehicle: 48 Months/50,000 miles
  • Powertrain: 96 Months/100,000 miles
  • High-voltage battery: 96 Months /100,000 miles to 70% capacity
  • Corrosion protection: 120 Months/unlimited mileage
  • Body and paint defects: 48 Months/unlimited mileage
  • Supplemental Restraint System: 60 Months/60,000 miles

Rivian Challenges

Rivian, the EV Company backed by Ford, has garnered positive attention as it has a high number of satisfied buyers. However, owners have reported a few challenges with their vehicles. These issues include unexpected movement of Rivian RIT trucks while in the “parked” position on a downhill slope, sudden stops in traffic, quality problems with the roof glass, rattling passenger seats due to missing bolts, and a “vampire” battery drain problem. However, consumers have practiced brand loyalty. Rivian must resolve these issues to maintain customer satisfaction and provide a first-class driving experience.

Comparing to Tesla’s Journey

Lucid Motors and Rivian, two promising electric vehicle startups, are currently facing reported issues with their respective models: 

  • Lucid Air 
  • Rivian R1T trucks
  • Rivians R1S SUV

These challenges are reminiscent of the time when Tesla encountered similar challenges. Tesla resolved such issues over time. To establish themselves in the market, Lucid Motors and Rivian must address and resolve these issues properly. 

Bottom Line 

Lucid Motors and Rivian, two prominent electric vehicle startups, have recently faced reported issues with their vehicles. Lucid Air owners encountered several problems. Similarly, Rivian owners have experienced unexpected movement in the “parked position,” rattling seats, and battery drain problems. These conundrums raise concerns about the long-term success of the companies. 

Don’t navigate hybrid or EV complexities alone! When safeguarding your reimbursements for manufacturing faults, partner with expert attorneys with a proven record of victories. Join forces with the Lemon Firm; dial (833) Lemon-Firm to chat with a skilled case analyst today!

General Motors has announced a recall for certain models of Chevy Equinox recently. The recall is due to a fuel pump flow issue that could cause the engine to stall, increasing the risk of an accident. To ensure your safety, it’s crucial for Equinox owners to determine if their vehicle is subject to a recall and take necessary measures.

A Brief Overview

The recall covers models from 2021 to 2022 having contamination in the fuel pump that can restrict its flow, leading to stalling or failure. The issue can cause safety hazards for drivers and passengers. Therefore, it is essential for Chevy Equinox owners to learn and understand the details of the recall. Moreover, the GMC Terrain 2022 model is also being recalled as it is affected by the same issue with its engine. The recall involves replacing the affected fuel pumps to ensure the safety of the vehicle.

Which Vehicles Are Affected by the Recall?

The recall affected more than 23,000 vehicles. So, make sure your vehicle is not at risk for any potential fuel pump-related issues. GM has stated that the issue will be fixed free of cost by replacing the fuel pump module. The company will make sure that the vehicles meet safety standards. 

The following vehicle models are affected by the recall: 

  • Chevy Equinox 2021
  • Chevy Equinox 2022
  • GMC Terrain 2022

Possible Implications Arising from Fuel Pump Flow Issue

The recall of Chevy Equinox due to an inadequate fuel pump flow issue raises concerns about the potential consequences of such a problem. One of the major consequences of this issue is the risk of engine stalling. It may cause accidents. Furthermore, the problem can lead to an engine misfire. As a result, it can decrease power and acceleration. Fuel pump flow issues can also cause fuel pressure to drop. Ultimately, it will affect the proper functioning of the fuel injection system. In addition, prolonged driving with an inadequate fuel pump flow can cause internal engine damage.

How to Assess If Your Vehicle Is Affected?

It’s crucial to stay informed about any potential issues with your vehicle. To assess whether your vehicle is affected, check the VIN on NHTSA official site and cross-reference it with the recall list. Additionally, if you experience difficulty starting or reduced performance, take it to the mechanic for inspection. Remember that it’s better to be proactive and address issues in time.

Bottom Line

In conclusion, the recall due to engine stalling is a serious issue that shouldn’t be taken lightly. The safety of people should always be a priority for manufacturers. Customers with vehicles affected should contact their local dealerships immediately for a free repair. Car owners must stay informed about recalls and take immediate action if they suspect any vehicle issues. 

We at Lemon Firm specialize in suing automakers for selling vehicles with manufacturer defects. If you have faced similar issues with your hybrid or EV, contact us at (833) Lemon-firm. Our expert chevy lemon attorneys will help you recover the compensation you deserve.

Audi is known for its luxury vehicles and SUVs. Having a history of about 100 years with its elegant and innovative models and unique features, Audi is a brand of class and splendor. However, three of the models of this Ingolstadt-based company are facing a recall upon critical safety concerns of folding and tearing of airbags. Read the article for more details!

Recall Details from the Company

During the safety tests of the Audi Q4 e-Tron, the manufacturers came across a serious safety issue. The curtain airbag of that model was damaged and torn apart in the conformity tests. A similar type of defect was found in Audi A8 and S8. The inability of these vehicles to properly fold their airbags during the test drives forced the company to issue a recall. These recalls were issued through NHTSA and asked the dealerships to take proper measures.

Problems Reported After the Test

The following issues were detected by the test engineers in A8, S8, and Q4 e-Tron models:

  • During deployment, the door seal of the Q4 model might become distorted, releasing the metallic inlay within the seal and tearing up the airbag.
  • In addition to safety risk, this airbag problem is against the ejection mitigation’s safety standard #226.
  • A8 and S8 models by Audi car manufacturers have airbag folding faults, which again have serious consequences during accidents and car crashes.
  • The impact of incorrect airbag folding is serious for children and short people as the possible force of inflating airbags imposes greater injury threats.

Number of Units Recalled By Audi Manufacturers

Audi automakers have confirmed that they are unaware of any complaints, claims, or accident reports regarding airbag faults in the aforementioned models. For safety concerns, the company has recalled more than four thousand units of Q4 e-Tron manufactured between 2022 and 2023. If we talk about the A8 model, 692 units manufactured from May 3, 2022, to December 7, 2022, are subject to recall.

After detecting the S8 airbag problem, 355 units (2022) were given recall. A statement issued by Audi denotes that all the models produced after December 7, 2022, are damage-free and meet all the safety standards.

Measures Were Taken By Automakers to Mitigate the Problem

After all the tests and problem identifications, Audi makers have given relief to their customers. In the Q4 e-Tron, the company has decided to install cloth tape in the B-pillar areas of the front seats to keep the door seal intact. You can contact the closest dealership and ask for the repair. For A8 and S8 models, the company ordered the dealership to replace the airbag modules of the front passenger seats.

Bottom Line

Airbags are the major life savers in every car crash. The problem in such a critical part is a major setback in luxury vehicles. If you are the owner of any of the above-mentioned car models and facing the problem, you can contact the expert attorneys of Lemon firm. 

Call (833)Lemon-firm and seek solutions from a Lemon Law expert today.